2013년 11월 24일 일요일

오전 11:18

By Malia Bolenbaugh

In: , , , , , , ,

No comments

About 'best design schools'|Fashion Design Schools: Choosing the BEST among the Rest







About 'best design schools'|Fashion Design Schools: Choosing the BEST among the Rest








"Ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｇｒａｎｄｅｕｒ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｖｉｅｗ               ｏｆ               ｌｉｆｅ,               ｗｉｔｈ               ｉｔｓ               ｓｅｖｅｒａｌ               ｐｏｗｅｒｓ,               ｈａｖｉｎｇ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｏｒｉｇｉｎａｌｌｙ               ｂｒｅａｔｈｅｄ               ｉｎｔｏ               ａ               ｆｅｗ               ｆｏｒｍｓ               ｏｒ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｏｎｅ;               ａｎｄ               ｔｈａｔ,               ｗｈｉｌｓｔ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｐｌａｎｅｔ               ｈａｓ               ｇｏｎｅ               ｃｙｃｌｉｎｇ               ｏｎ               ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｉｘｅｄ               ｌａｗ               ｏｆ               ｇｒａｖｉｔｙ,               ｆｒｏｍ               ｓｏ               ｓｉｍｐｌｅ               ａ               ｂｅｇｉｎｎｉｎｇ               ｅｎｄｌｅｓｓ               ｆｏｒｍｓ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｂｅａｕｔｉｆｕｌ               ａｎｄ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｗｏｎｄｅｒｆｕｌ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ,               ａｎｄ               ａｒｅ               ｂｅｉｎｇ,               ｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ."
Ｃｈａｒｌｅｓ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ,               Ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               Ｏｒｉｇｉｎ               ｏｆ               Ｓｐｅｃｉｅｓ               Ｔｈｅ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ/ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ               ｃｏｎｔｒｏｖｅｒｓｙ               ｉｓ               ｃｏｎｃｅｒｎｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｗｈａｔ,               ｉｆ               ａｎｙｔｈｉｎｇ,               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｔａｕｇｈｔ               ａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｌｅｖｅｌ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｍ               ａｎｄ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ.

Ｔｈｉｓ               ｃｏｎｔｒｏｖｅｒｓｙ               ｗａｓ               ｓｅｔ               ｉｎ               ｍｏｔｉｏｎ               ｂｙ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ'ｓ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               "Ｏｎ               Ｔｈｅ               Ｏｒｉｇｉｎ               ｏｆ               Ｓｐｅｃｉｅｓ"               ｉｎ               1859,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｐｒｏｐｏｓｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ａｌｌ               ｓｐｅｃｉｅｓ               ａｌｉｖｅ               ｔｏｄａｙ               ｈａｄ               ｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ               (ａｎｄ               ｃｏｎｔｉｎｕｅ               ｔｏ               ｅｖｏｌｖｅ)               ｆｒｏｍ               ｓｉｍｐｌｅｒ,               ｌｅｓｓ-ａｄａｐｔｅｄ               ｏｒｇａｎｉｓｍｓ.

Ｄａｒｗｉｎ'ｓ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｉｎｔｒｅｐｉｄ               "Ｔｈｅ               Ｄｅｓｃｅｎｔ               ｏｆ               Ｍａｎ",               ｐｕｂｌｉｓｈｅｄ               ｉｎ               1871,               ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ               ｐｒｏｐｏｓｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｈｕｍａｎｓ               ｈａｄ               ｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｐｒｉｍａｔｅｓ.

Ｉｎ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ｔｗｏ               ｂｏｏｋｓ,               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ               ｄｉｄ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｗｈａｔ               Ｃｏｐｅｒｎｉｃｕｓ,               ｓｅｖｅｒａｌ               ｃｅｎｔｕｒｉｅｓ               ｅａｒｌｉｅｒ,               ｈａｄ               ｄｏｎｅ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｅ               Ｅａｒｔｈ-ｃｅｎｔｅｒｅｄ               ｖｉｅｗ               ｏｆ               ｏｕｒ               ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｅ.

Ｉｎ               ｅｓｓｅｎｃｅ,               ｈｅ               ｏｖｅｒｔｕｒｎｅｄ               ａ               ｃｏｍｐｌｅｔｅｌｙ               ａｃｃｅｐｔｅｄ               ｗｏｒｌｄ               ｖｉｅｗ,               ｔｈａｔ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｄｅａ               ｔｈａｔ               ａｌｌ               ｌｉｆｅ               ｈａｄ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｃｒｅａｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ａ               ｄｉｖｉｎｅ               ｂｅｉｎｇ               (ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｍ),               ａｎｄ               ｒｅｐｌａｃｅｄ               ｉｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｐｏｓｔｕｌａｔｅ,               ｔｈａｔ               ａｌｌ               ｌｉｆｅ               ｈａｄ               ｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｓｉｍｐｌｅ,               ｍｏｒｅ               ｃｒｕｄｅ,               ａｎｄ               ｌｅｓｓ               ａｄｅｐｔ               ｏｒｇａｎｉｓｍｓ               (ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｂｙ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌ               ｓｅｌｅｃｔｉｏｎ,               ｏｒ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌｉｓｍ).
               Ｃｈａｒｌｅｓ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ               ｃｏｒｒｅｃｔｌｙ               ｐｒｅｄｉｃｔｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｈｉｓ               ｃｏｎｔｅｍｐｏｒａｒｉｅｓ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｈａｖｅ               ｔｒｏｕｂｌｅ               ａｃｃｅｐｔｉｎｇ               ｈｉｓ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｕｔａｂｉｌｉｔｙ               ｏｆ               ｓｐｅｃｉｅｓ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｈｅ               ｗｒｏｔｅ,               "Ｉ               ｂｙ               ｎｏ               ｍｅａｎｓ               ｅｘｐｅｃｔ               ｔｏ               ｃｏｎｖｉｎｃｅ               ｅｘｐｅｒｉｅｎｃｅｄ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌｉｓｔｓ....Ａｎｙ               ｏｎｅ               ｗｈｏｓｅ               ｄｉｓｐｏｓｉｔｉｏｎ               ｌｅａｄｓ               ｈｉｍ               ｔｏ               ａｔｔａｃｈ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｗｅｉｇｈｔ               ｔｏ               ｕｎｅｘｐｌａｉｎｅｄ               ｄｉｆｆｉｃｕｌｔｉｅｓ               ｔｈａｎ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｘｐｌａｎａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ａ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ               ｎｕｍｂｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｆａｃｔｓ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎｌｙ               ｒｅｊｅｃｔ               ｍｙ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ."               Ｎｏｔ               ｏｎｌｙ               ｗａｓ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ               ｃｏｒｒｅｃｔ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｈｉｓ               ｃｏｎｔｅｍｐｏｒａｒｉｅｓ               ｒｅｊｅｃｔｉｎｇ               ｈｉｓ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ,               ｂｕｔ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｔｏｄａｙ,               ｓｏｍｅ               150               ｙｅａｒｓ               ｌａｔｅｒ,               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｓｔｓ,               ｆｕｎｄａｍｅｎｔａｌｉｓｔｓ,               ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃｉａｎｓ               ａｎｄ               Ｓｕｐｒｅｍｅ               Ｃｏｕｒｔ               ｊｕｄｇｅｓ               ａｒｅ               ｓｔｉｌｌ               ｂｉｃｋｅｒｉｎｇ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｖａｌｉｄｉｔｙ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｖｅｒｓｕｓ               ｓｐｅｃｉａｌ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ,               ａｎｄ               ｗｈｅｔｈｅｒ               ｅｉｔｈｅｒ               ｖｉｅｗ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｔａｕｇｈｔ               ｉｎ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ.
               Ｐｅｒｈａｐｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｆａｍｏｕｓ               ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ/ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｃｏｎｔｒｏｖｅｒｓｙ               ｅｍｅｒｇｅｄ               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               1925               Ｓｃｏｐｅｓ               ｔｒｉａｌ.

Ｔｈｅ               "Ｍｏｎｋｅｙ               Ｔｒｉａｌ",               ａｓ               ｔｈｅ               Ｓｃｏｐｅｓ               ｔｒｉａｌ               ｃａｍｅ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｃａｌｌｅｄ,               ｗａｓ               ｉｎｓｔｉｇａｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ               Ｃｉｖｉｌ               Ｌｉｂｅｒｔｉｅｓ               Ｕｎｉｏｎ               ｔｏ               ｃｈａｌｌｅｎｇｅ               ａ               ｃｏｎｔｒｏｖｅｒｓｉａｌ               Ｔｅｎｎｅｓｓｅｅ               ｌａｗ               ｂａｎｎｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｎ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｈｉｇｈ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌｓ.

Ｊｏｈｎ               Ｓｃｏｐｅｓ,               ａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｑｕｅｓｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ＡＣＬＵ,               ａｇｒｅｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｃｈａｌｌｅｎｇｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔａｔｕｔｅ               ｂｙ               ｐｕｒｐｏｓｅｌｙ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｎ               ｈｉｓ               ｃｌａｓｓｒｏｏｍ,               ｒｅｓｕｌｔｉｎｇ               ｉｎ               ｐｒｏｓｅｃｕｔｉｏｎ.

Ｓｃｏｐｅｓ               ｗａｓ               ｅｖｅｎｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｆｏｕｎｄ               ｇｕｉｌｔｙ,               ｂｕｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｊｕｄｇｅ               ｉｍｐｏｓｅｄ               ａ               ｍｉｎｉｍｕｍ               ｆｉｎｅ               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               Ｔｅｎｎｅｓｓｅｅ               Ｓｕｐｒｅｍｅ               Ｃｏｕｒｔ               ｍａｎａｇｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｏｖｅｒｔｕｒｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｎｖｉｃｔｉｏｎ               ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ               ｉｎｖａｌｉｄａｔｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｌａｗ.
               Ｂａｃｋ               ｔｈｅｎ,               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔｓ               ｃｏｎｔｅｎｄｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎｉｓｔｓ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｂａｓｉｓ               ｏｆ               ｍｏｒａｌ               ａｎｄ               ｒｅｌｉｇｉｏｕｓ               ｇｒｏｕｎｄｓ,               ａｓ               ｅｖｉｄｅｎｃｅｄ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ａｒｇｕｍｅｎｔｓ               ｐｏｓｅｄ               ａｇａｉｎｓｔ               Ｓｃｏｐｅｓ               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ｈｉｓ               ｔｒｉａｌ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔｓ               ｏｆ               ｔｏｄａｙ               ａｒｅｎ'ｔ               ｓｏ               ｅｘｔｒｅｍｅ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｖｉｅｗｓ...ｓｏ,               ｗｈａｔ               ｅｘａｃｔｌｙ               ａｒｅ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｂｅｌｉｅｆｓ?
               Ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔ               ｃａｍｐ,               ｃｏｍｐｏｓｅｄ               ｏｆ               ｆｕｎｄａｍｅｎｔａｌｉｓｔｓ,               Ｃａｔｈｏｌｉｃｓ,               ａｖｅｒａｇｅ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｓｕｒｐｒｉｓｉｎｇｌｙ,               ｅｖｅｎ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｓｔｓ               ｓｕｃｈ               ａｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｂｉｏｌｏｇｉｓｔ               Ｍｉｃｈａｅｌ               Ｂｅｈｅ               (ｗｈｏ,               ｉｎｃｉｄｅｎｔａｌｌｙ,               ｉｓ               Ｃａｔｈｏｌｉｃ),               ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｌｉｖｉｎｇ               ｏｒｇａｎｉｓｍｓ               ａｒｅ               ｔｏｏ               ｃｏｍｐｌｅｘ               ｔｏ               ｈａｖｅ               ｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ               ｓｉｍｐｌｙ               ｖｉａ               ｃｈａｎｃｅ               ｍｕｔａｔｉｏｎ               ｃｏｕｐｌｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌ               ｓｅｌｅｃｔｉｏｎ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｇｒｏｕｐ               ａｌｓｏ               ｐｏｉｎｔｓ               ｔｏ               ｇａｐｉｎｇ               "ｈｏｌｅｓ"               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｏｓｓｉｌ               ｒｅｃｏｒｄ,               ｓｕｃｈ               ａｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｕｄｄｅｎ               ｅｘｐａｎｓｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｎｏｖｅｌ               ｓｐｅｃｉｅｓ               ｄｕｒｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               Ｃａｍｂｒｉａｎ               ｐｅｒｉｏｄ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ａｒｇｕｅ               ａｇａｉｎｓｔ               ｔｈｅ               ａｃｃｅｐｔｅｄ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎａｒｙ               ｉｄｅａ               ｏｆ               ｇｒａｄｕａｌ               ｓｐｅｃｉｅｓ               ｍｏｄｉｆｉｃａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｖｅｒ               ｌｏｎｇ               ｐｅｒｉｏｄｓ               ｏｆ               ｔｉｍｅ.

Ａｓ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ               ｈｉｍｓｅｌｆ               ｐｒｅｄｉｃｔｅｄ,               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ａｒｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌｓ               ｗｈｏ               "ａｔｔａｃｈ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｗｅｉｇｈｔ               ｔｏ               ｕｎｅｘｐｌａｉｎｅｄ               ｄｉｆｆｉｃｕｌｔｉｅｓ               ｔｈａｎ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｘｐｌａｎａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ａ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ               ｎｕｍｂｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｆａｃｔｓ."
               Ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ,               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎ               ｍｅｍｂｅｒｓ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔ               ｃａｍｐ               ｈａｖｅ               ｔａｋｅｎ               ａｎ               ｉｎｔｅｒｅｓｔｉｎｇ               ｔｕｒｎ:               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｍ,               ｔｈｅ               ｏｎｃｅ               ｐｒｅｖａｌｅｎｔ               ｂｅｌｉｅｆ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｉｔｅｒａｌ               ｉｎｔｅｒｐｒｅｔａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               Ｇｅｎｅｓｉｓ,               ｃｏｍｐｌｅｔｅ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｓｉｘ               ｄａｙｓ               ｏｆ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ,               ａ               ｆａｃｔｕａｌ               Ｇａｒｄｅｎ               ｏｆ               Ｅｄｅｎ               ａｎｄ               ｅｖｅｎ               ａ               ｃａｔａｃｌｙｓｍｉｃ               ｆｌｏｏｄ,               ｈａｓ               ｉｔｓｅｌｆ               ｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅｃｏｍｅ               "Ｉｎｔｅｌｌｉｇｅｎｔ               Ｄｅｓｉｇｎ".

Ｉｎｔｅｌｌｉｇｅｎｔ               Ｄｅｓｉｇｎ,               ｏｒ               Ｉ.Ｄ.,               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｒｏｐｏｓａｌ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｆｅａｔｕｒｅｓ               ｏｆ               ｌｉｖｉｎｇ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ               (ａｎｄ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｌｉｖｉｎｇ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ               ｔｈｅｍｓｅｌｖｅｓ)               ａｒｅ               ｂｅｓｔ               ｅｘｐｌａｉｎｅｄ               ａｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｗｏｒｋ               ｏｆ               ａ               ｄｅｓｉｇｎｅｒ               ｒａｔｈｅｒ               ｔｈａｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔ               ｏｆ               ｒａｎｄｏｍ               ｐｒｏｃｅｓｓｅｓ               ｓｕｃｈ               ａｓ               ｍｕｔａｔｉｏｎ               ａｎｄ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌ               ｓｅｌｅｃｔｉｏｎ.

Ｉｎ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｒｅｓｐｅｃｔ,               Ｇｅｎｅｓｉｓ               ｎｅｅｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｂｅ               ｉｎｔｅｒｐｒｅｔｅｄ               ｌｉｔｅｒａｌｌｙ;               ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,               ｌｉｆｅ               ａｓ               ｗｅ               ｋｎｏｗ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔ               ｏｆ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｄｉｖｉｎｅ               Ｐｒｉｍｏｒｄｉａｌ               Ｍｏｖｅｒ.

Ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅａｎｓ,               ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ               ｉｍｐｅｒｆｅｃｔ,               ｂｙ               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｔｈｉｓ               Ｐｒｉｍｏｒｄｉａｌ               Ｍｏｖｅｒ               ｍａｋｅｓ               ａｌｌ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ               ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｅ.

Ａｎｄ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｗｅ               ｓａｙ               ｉｍｐｅｒｆｅｃｔ,               ｗｅ               ｕｎｄｅｒｓｔａｎｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｍｅｒｅｌｙ               ａ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ,               ｎｏｔ               ｃｏｎｃｒｅｔｅ               ｆａｃｔ,               ａｔｔｅｍｐｔｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｅｘｐｌａｉｎ               ｈｏｗ               ｔｈｅ               Ｐｒｉｍｏｒｄｉａｌ               Ｍｏｖｅｒ               ｍａｙ               ｈａｖｅ               ｃｈｏｓｅｎ               ｔｏ               ｃｒｅａｔｅ               ｌｉｆｅ.

Ｔｈｕｓ,               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｍａｙ               ｎｏｔ               ｈａｖｅ               ｈａｐｐｅｎｅｄ               ａｔ               ａｌｌ.
               Ｉｓ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｓｕｃｈ               ａ               ｂｉｇ               ｔｈｒｅａｔ               ｔｏ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎａｒｙ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ?

Ａ               ｌａｒｇｅ               ｐｅｒｃｅｎｔａｇｅ               ｏｆ               ａｖｅｒａｇｅ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎｓ               ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅ               ｉｎ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｋｉｎｄ               ｏｆ               ｄｉｖｉｎｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ               ａｎｙｗａｙ.

Ｓｉｍｉｌａｒｌｙ,               ａ               ｇｏｏｄ               ｍａｊｏｒｉｔｙ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ａｖｅｒａｇｅ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎｓ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｈａｒｄ-ｐｒｅｓｓｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｓａｙ               ｔｈａｔ               ｈｕｍａｎｓ               ａｒｅ               ｄｅｓｃｅｎｄｅｄ               ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｎｏｎ-ｈｕｍａｎ               ａｎｃｅｓｔｏｒｓ.

Ｑｕｉｔｅ               ｆｒａｎｋｌｙ,               ｗｈａｔ'ｓ               ｗｒｏｎｇ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａｓｓｕｍｉｎｇ,               ａｎｄ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ,               ｔｈａｔ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｍａｙ               ｎｏｔ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｏｌｅ               ｉｍｐｅｔｕｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｌｉｆｅ               ａｓ               ｗｅ               ｋｎｏｗ               ｉｔ?
               Ｔｈｅ               ｐｒｏｂｌｅｍ               ｂｅｇｉｎｓ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｃａｍｐ'ｓ               ｌａｒｇｅｒ               ａｇｅｎｄａ:               ｔｏ               ｈａｖｅ               ｓｔａｔｅｍｅｎｔｓ,               ｓｕｃｈ               ａｓ               ｔｈｉｓ,               ｒｅａｄ               ｂｅｆｏｒｅ               ａｌｌ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｈｉｇｈ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｃｌａｓｓｒｏｏｍｓ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｔｏ               ｕｎｄｅｒｔａｋｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔｕｄｙ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎａｒｙ               ｂｉｏｌｏｇｙ:               "Ｄａｒｗｉｎ'ｓ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ,               ｎｏｔ               ｆａｃｔ.

Ｇａｐｓ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｅｘｉｓｔ               ｆｏｒ               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｎｏ               ｅｖｉｄｅｎｃｅ...

Ａｓ               ｉｓ               ｔｒｕｅ               ｗｉｔｈ               ａｎｙ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ,               ｓｔｕｄｅｎｔｓ               ａｒｅ               ｅｎｃｏｕｒａｇｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｋｅｅｐ               ａｎ               ｏｐｅｎ               ｍｉｎｄ...Ｉｎｔｅｌｌｉｇｅｎｔ               Ｄｅｓｉｇｎ               ｉｓ               ａｎ               ｅｘｐｌａｎａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｒｉｇｉｎ               ｏｆ               ｌｉｆｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｄｉｆｆｅｒｓ               ｆｒｏｍ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ'ｓ               ｖｉｅｗ               [ｐａｒａｐｈｒａｓｅｄ]."               Ａｎｄ               ｌｉｋｅｗｉｓｅ,               ａｓ               Ｐｅｎｎｓｙｌｖａｎｉａ               Ｓｅｎａｔｏｒ               Ｒｉｃｋ               Ｓａｎｔｏｒｕｍ               ｓｔａｔｅｄ,               "Ｗｅ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ...ｐｒｏｂｌｅｍｓ               ａｎｄ               ｈｏｌｅｓ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ."
               Ｗｈｉｌｅ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｇｏｏｄ               ｉｄｅａ               ｔｏ               ｋｅｅｐ               ａｎ               ｏｐｅｎ               ｍｉｎｄ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ａｌｌ               ｔｈｅｏｒｉｅｓ,               ｗｈｅｎ               ｉｔ               ｃｏｍｅｓ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ               ｏｆ               ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｏｍｏｒｒｏｗ'ｓ               ｂｏｔａｎｉｓｔｓ,               ｇｅｎｅｔｉｃｉｓｔｓ,               ａｎｔｈｒｏｐｏｌｏｇｉｓｔｓ,               ｅｔｃ.,               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｊｕｓｔ               ｗｏｎ'ｔ               ｄｏ.

Ｄａｒｗｉｎ'ｓ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈａｎ               ｊｕｓｔ               ａ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ:               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｂａｃｋｅｄ               ｕｐ               ｂｙ               ｄｅｃａｄｅｓ               ｏｆ               ｅｘｐｅｒｉｍｅｎｔａｌ               ｅｖｉｄｅｎｃｅ               (ｆｏｒ               ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ,               ａｎｔｉｂｉｏｔｉｃ               ｒｅｓｉｓｔａｎｃｅ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｄｉｒｅｃｔ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔ               ｏｆ               ｂａｃｔｅｒｉａｌ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｏｃｃｕｒｒｉｎｇ               ｖｉａ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌ,               ａｌｂｅｉｔ               ａｎｔｉｂｉｏｔｉｃ,               ｓｅｌｅｃｔｉｏｎ).

Ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｔｈｅｏｒｉｅｓ               ｓｔａｒｔ               ｏｕｔ               ａｓ               ｈｙｐｏｔｈｅｓｅｓ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｎｅｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｅｘｐｅｒｉｍｅｎｔａｌｌｙ               ｐｒｏｖｅｎ,               ａｇａｉｎ               ａｎｄ               ａｇａｉｎ,               ａｎｄ               ｓｕｆｆｉｃｉｅｎｔ               ｅｖｉｄｅｎｃｅ               ａｃｃｕｍｕｌａｔｅｄ               ｂｅｆｏｒｅ               ａｎｙ               ｈｙｐｏｔｈｅｓｉｓ               ｂｅｃｏｍｅｓ               ｇｅｎｅｒａｌｌｙ               ａｃｃｅｐｔｅｄ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ.

Ｓｕｃｈ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｃａｓｅ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｎｉｔｉａｌ               ｈｙｐｏｔｈｅｓｉｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｎｏｗ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ,               ｏｆ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎｉａｎ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ.
               Ｉ.Ｄ.,               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ｈａｎｄ,               ｉｓ               ａ               ｂｅｌｉｅｆ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｄｉｖｉｎｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｌｉｆｅ.

Ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ａ               ｈｙｐｏｔｈｅｓｉｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｔｅｓｔｅｄ               ｅｘｐｅｒｉｍｅｎｔａｌｌｙ;               ｔｈｅｒｅｆｏｒｅ,               ｉｔ               ｃａｎ               ｎｅｖｅｒ               ｂｅｃｏｍｅ               ａ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｅ               ｓｔａｎｄｉｎｇ               ａｓ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ.

Ｏｎｅ               ｍｉｇｈｔ               ｃｈｏｏｓｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｅａｃｈ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｉｎ               ａ               ｓｏｃｉｏｌｏｇｙ,               ｒｅｌｉｇｉｏｎ               ｏｒ               ｈｉｓｔｏｒｙ               ｃｌａｓｓ,               ｂｕｔ               ｎｏｔ               ｉｎ               ａ               ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅ               ｃｌａｓｓ.

Ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅ               ｄｅａｌｓ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｆａｃｔｓ,               ｎｏｔ               ｃｏｎｊｅｃｔｕｒｅｓ               ｏｒ               ｂｅｌｉｅｆｓ.

Ｉｎ               ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅ,               ｏｎｌｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｈｙｐｏｔｈｅｓｉｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｄｉｓｐｒｏｖｅｎ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｖａｌｉｄ               ｈｙｐｏｔｈｅｓｉｓ.

Ａｎｄ               ｏｎｅ               ｃｅｒｔａｉｎｌｙ               ｃａｎｎｏｔ               ｄｉｓｐｒｏｖｅ               (ｏｒ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｐｒｏｖｅ)               ｔｈｅ               ｅｘｉｓｔｅｎｃｅ               ｏｆ               Ｇｏｄ.
               Ｕｎｆｏｒｔｕｎａｔｅｌｙ,               ｔｈｅ               ｎｅｗｌｙ-ｅｖｏｌｖｅｄ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｃａｍｐ               ｉｓ               ｄｏｉｎｇ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈａｎ               ｗｉｓｈｆｕｌ               ｔｈｉｎｋｉｎｇ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｉｔ               ｃｏｍｅｓ               ｔｏ               ｐｕｓｈｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔ               ａｇｅｎｄａ               ｆｏｒｗａｒｄ.

Ａｒｇｕｉｎｇ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｃｏｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｓ               ｆｒｅｅ               ｓｐｅｅｃｈ,               ａｎｄ               ｆｕｒｔｈｅｒｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈａｔ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｉｓ,               ｉｎ               ｉｔｓｅｌｆ,               ｓｏｕｎｄ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ,               ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔｓ               ｈａｖｅ               ｂｅｅｎ               ａｂｌｅ               ｔｏ               ｇｒａｂ               ａ               ｆｏｏｔｈｏｌｄ               ｉｎ               ｓｔａｔｅ               ａｎｄ               ｌｏｃａｌ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｂｏａｒｄｓ,               ｅｓｐｅｃｉａｌｌｙ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｂｏａｒｄｓ               ｏｆ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ               ｓｔａｔｅｓ               ｌｉｋｅ               Ｋａｎｓａｓ,               Ｔｅｘａｓ               ａｎｄ               Ｆｌｏｒｉｄａ.

Ｃｕｒｒｅｎｔｌｙ,               ｆｏｕｒ               ｓｔａｔｅｓ-               Ｆｌｏｒｉｄａ,               Ｋｅｎｔｕｃｋｙ,               Ｍｉｓｓｉｓｓｉｐｐｉ               ａｎｄ               Ｏｋｌａｈｏｍａ-               ｍａｋｅ               ｎｏ               ｍｅｎｔｉｏｎ               ｗｈａｔｓｏｅｖｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｃｕｒｒｉｃｕｌｕｍ               ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄｓ.

Ｔｈｕｓ,               ｔｅａｃｈｅｒｓ               ａｒｅ               ｆｒｅｅ               ｔｏ               ｉｍｐｏｓｅ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｖｉｅｗｓ               ｏｎ               ｗｈｅｔｈｅｒ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｓｔｕｄｅｎｔｓ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｌｅａｒｎ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ-               ｏｒ               ｎｏｔ.
               Ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｆａｒ               ｃｒｙ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｈｅ               "ｃｒｉｔｉｃａｌ               ｉｎｑｕｉｒｙ"               ｉｎｔｏ               ａｌｔｅｒｎａｔｅ               ｏｒｉｇｉｎ               ｔｈｅｏｒｉｅｓ               ｉｎｉｔｉａｌｌｙ               ｐｒｏｐｏｓｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｓｉｄｅ.

Ｏｎｅ               ｗｏｎｄｅｒｓ               ｗｈａｔ               ｓｏｒｔ               ｏｆ               ｉｎｔｅｌｌｅｃｔｕａｌ               ｄｅｂａｔｅ               ｃａｎ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｂｅ,               ｗｈｅｎ               ｉｎ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｓｔａｔｅｓ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎａｒｙ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｒｏｗｎ               ｏｕｔ               ａｌｔｏｇｅｔｈｅｒ?
               Ａｎｏｔｈｅｒ               ｂｉｇ               ｐｕｓｈ               ｆｏｒ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｉｎ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｈｉｇｈ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌｓ               ｈａｓ               ｒｅｓｕｌｔｅｄ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｏｕｎｄｉｎｇ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               Ｓｅａｔｔｌｅ-ｂａｓｅｄ               Ｄｉｓｃｏｖｅｒｙ               Ｉｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅ,               ａｎ               ａｇｅｎｃｙ               ｐｒｏｖｉｄｉｎｇ               ｇｒａｎｔｓ               ｔｏ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｓｔｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｕｒｐｏｓｅ               ｏｆ               ｐｕｂｌｉｓｈｉｎｇ               Ｉ.Ｄ.-ｂａｓｅｄ               ｂｏｏｋｓ               ａｎｄ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ｔｒｅａｔｉｓｅｓ.

Ｔｈｅ               Ｉｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅ               ａｎｄ               ｉｔｓ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｓｔ               ｍｅｍｂｅｒｓ               ｈａｖｅ               ａｌｓｏ               ｍａｄｅ               ｔｈｅｍｓｅｌｖｅｓ               ｋｎｏｗｎ               ｉｎ               ｄｅｂａｔｅｓ               ｏｖｅｒ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ               ａｔ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｂｏａｒｄ               ｍｅｅｔｉｎｇｓ               ａｎｄ               ｓｔａｔｅ               ｌｅｇｉｓｌａｔｕｒｅｓ.

Ｓｔａｔｅ-ｌｅｖｅｌ               ｄｅｂａｔｅｓ               ａｒｅ               ｅｘｔｒｅｍｅｌｙ               ｃｒｕｃｉａｌ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               Ｄｉｓｃｏｖｅｒｙ               Ｉｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅ,               ｓｉｎｃｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｗｈｅｒｅ               ｓｔａｔｅｗｉｄｅ               ｃｕｒｒｉｃｕｌｕｍ               ｓｔａｎｄａｒｄｓ               ａｒｅ               ｆｏｒｍｅｄ.

Ａｎｄ,               ｗｈｅｒｅａｓ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｐａｓｔ,               ｂｌａｔａｎｔ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｍ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ               ｗａｓ               ｓｔｒｕｃｋ               ｄｏｗｎ               ｂｙ               ｔｈｅ               Ｕ.Ｓ.

Ｓｕｐｒｅｍｅ               Ｃｏｕｒｔ               ａｓ               ａ               ｖｉｏｌａｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｃｈｕｒｃｈ               ａｎｄ               ｓｔａｔｅ,               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ｓｅｅｋｓ               ｔｏ               ｐａｓｓ               ｉｔｓｅｌｆ               ｏｆｆ               ａｓ               ａ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ,               ａ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ               ｗｈｏｓｅ               ｅｎｔｉｒｅ               ｐｒｅｍｉｓｅ               ｉｓ               ｔｏ               "ｐｏｋｅ               ｈｏｌｅｓ"               ａｔ               ａｎｄ               ｄｉｓｃｒｅｄｉｔ               ｃｕｒｒｅｎｔ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎａｒｙ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ.
               Ｓｏ               ｗｈａｔ               ｃａｎ               ｃｏｎｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｏｕｓ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎａｒｙ               ｂｉｏｌｏｇｉｓｔｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ｉｎｄｉｖｉｄｕａｌｓ               ｗｈｏ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｓｕｂｓｃｒｉｂｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎｉｓｔ               ｃａｍｐ,               ｄｏ?

Ｔｈｕｓ               ｆａｒ,               ｔｈｅ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｗｏｒｌｄ               ｈａｓ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｒｅｌｕｃｔａｎｔ               (ａｎｄ               ｐｏｓｓｉｂｌｙ               ａｐａｔｈｅｔｉｃ)               ａｂｏｕｔ               Ｉ.Ｄ.,               ｂａｓｅｄ               ｏｎ               Ｉ.Ｄ.'ｓ               ｌａｃｋ               ｏｆ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｍｅｒｉｔ.

Ｔｏ               ａｃｔｉｖｅｌｙ               ｅｎｇａｇｅ               ｉｎ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｄｅｂａｔｅ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ａ               ｂｅｌｉｅｆ               ｉｎ               ｓｐｅｃｉａｌ               ｃｒｅａｔｉｏｎ,               ａｓ               ｏｐｐｏｓｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｈａｒｄ               ｅｖｉｄｅｎｃｅ               ｏｆ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎ,               ｖａｌｉｄａｔｅｓ               Ｉ.Ｄ.

ａｓ               ａｎ               ａｌｔｅｒｎａｔｅ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｔｈｅｏｒｙ,               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｉｔ               ｄｅｆｉｎｉｔｅｌｙ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ.

Ｈｏｗｅｖｅｒ,               ｔｏ               ｓｉｔ               ｂａｃｋ               ａｎｄ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔｈｉｎｇ               ｉｓ               ｔｏ               ｉｎｖｉｔｅ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｆｉｃ               ｉｇｎｏｒａｎｃｅ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｏｕｒ               ｐｕｂｌｉｃ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌｓ.

Ｗｈｉｌｅ               ｅｖｏｌｕｔｉｏｎａｒｙ               ｔｅａｃｈｉｎｇ,               ｌｉｋｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｈｅｌｉｏｃｅｎｔｒｉｃ               ｖｉｅｗ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｅ,               ｗｉｌｌ               ｅｖｅｎｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｄｉｓｐｌａｃｅ               ｏｕｔｄａｔｅｄ               ｔｈｅｏｒｉｅｓ,               ｏｕｒ               ｂｅｓｔ               ｂｅｔ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｍｍｅｄｉａｔｅ               ｆｕｔｕｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｔｏ               ｉｎｖｏｌｖｅ               ｏｕｒｓｅｌｖｅｓ               ａｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｏｃａｌ,               ｃｉｔｙ,               ｓｔａｔｅ               ａｎｄ               ｎａｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｌｅｖｅｌｓ               ｏｆ               ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ.

Ｗｅ               ｍｕｓｔ               ｐａｒｔｉｃｉｐａｔｅ               ｉｎ               ｏｕｒ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｂｏａｒｄｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｗｅ               ｍｕｓｔ               ｒｅｓｅａｒｃｈ               ａｎｄ               ｖｏｔｅ               ｆｏｒ               ｏｔｈｅｒｓ               ａｓｐｉｒｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｐｏｓｉｔｉｏｎｓ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｂｏａｒｄｓ.

Ｏｕｒ               ｆｕｔｕｒｅ               ｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｓｔｓ               ｄｅｐｅｎｄ               ｏｎ               ｉｔ.
               Ｉｎ               ｃｏｎｃｌｕｓｉｏｎ,               Ｉ               ｄｒａｗ               ｈｏｐｅ               ｆｒｏｍ               ａ               ｌｉｎｅ               ｆｒｏｍ               Ｄａｒｗｉｎ:               "Ｉ               ｌｏｏｋ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｃｏｎｆｉｄｅｎｃｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｕｔｕｒｅ,               ｔｏ               ｙｏｕｎｇ               ａｎｄ               ｒｉｓｉｎｇ               ｎａｔｕｒａｌｉｓｔｓ,               ｗｈｏ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｂｅ               ａｂｌｅ               ｔｏ               ｖｉｅｗ               ｂｏｔｈ               ｓｉｄｅｓ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｉｍｐａｒｔｉａｌｉｔｙ.

Ｗｈｏｅｖｅｒ               ｉｓ               ｌｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｐｅｃｉｅｓ               ａｒｅ               ｍｕｔａｂｌｅ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｄｏ               ｇｏｏｄ               ｓｅｒｖｉｃｅ               ｂｙ               ｃｏｎｓｃｉｅｎｔｉｏｕｓｌｙ               ｅｘｐｒｅｓｓｉｎｇ               ｈｉｓ               ｃｏｎｖｉｃｔｉｏｎ;               ｆｏｒ               ｏｎｌｙ               ｔｈｕｓ               ｃａｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｏａｄ               ｏｆ               ｐｒｅｊｕｄｉｃｅ               ｂｙ               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ               ｉｓ               ｏｖｅｒｗｈｅｌｍｅｄ               ｂｅ               ｒｅｍｏｖｅｄ."






Image of best design schools






best design schools
best design schools


best design schools Image 1


best design schools
best design schools


best design schools Image 2


best design schools
best design schools


best design schools Image 3


best design schools
best design schools


best design schools Image 4


best design schools
best design schools


best design schools Image 5


  • Related blog with best design schools





    1. fashionschoolsblog.blogspot.com/   05/23/2011
      ..., and finally, decide. Get ready to embark on a journey that you have never quite experienced before! Off you go to the one of the best fashion design schools in the world!
    2. worldranking.blogspot.com/   06/15/2009
      What are the best design schools in the world? BusinessWeek ...world's most prestigious art and design schools, It offers a wide range...
    3. untintdes.blogspot.com/   07/08/2013
      ...inform our issue America’s Best Architecture & Design Schools 2014. There has... issue of America’s Best Architecture & Design Schools yet. Please feel free to...
    4. mootee.typepad.com/innovation_playground/   06/17/2011
      ...if you want to have a good design foundation, here are the lists of best design schools in US and UK for you to consider (there are many good ones outside...
    5. worldranking.blogspot.com/   06/15/2009
      ...to the BusinessWeek's survey of 60 Best Design Schools in the world, some of the UK ...QS World Rankings). Garden Design School (GDS) GDS offers one-year...
    6. yourfashionschools.blogspot.com/   01/23/2008
      ...finally, decide. Tip#10 – Get ready to embark on a journey that you have never quite experienced before! Off you go to the one of the best fashion design schools in the world!
    7. nitawriter.wordpress.com/   12/11/2007
      ...and the Industrial Design Centre at...a total of 60 D-schools which it considers the best in the world and...such as strategic design, automotive design and...
    8. designmanagement.typepad.com/dmmaster/   10/03/2009
      ...strongly pushing an agenda of sustainable design - every year teams tackle big global ...student at Pratt which was, by far, the best learning experience I've ever had...
    9. jtownguidance.wordpress.com/   03/23/2011
      ... been named the Princeton Review and GamePro Media ‘s best school for video game design at the undergraduate and graduate level in 2011. In 2010 and 2011, the Princeton Review ...
    10. jojotastic.wordpress.com/   10/13/2009
      ...Balance Why it’s on the list: The program is a collaboration between Carnegie Mellon’s School of Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, and the Tepper School of Business. During the...

      11. Best Design Schools - Blog Homepage Results

      ...Cagayan de Oro architects, contractors, home builders, house design pool | Cagayan de Oro Construction Philippines – Home choice Planners and Construction...bycdolinks
      http://cdolinks.wordpress.com/
      Information Throughout the World
      Graphic Design Schoolsbygraphicschools
      http://graphicschools.wordpress.com/
      Best Graphic Design Schools Courses
      Old School Tattoo Designsbyoldschooltattoodesigns
      http://oldschooltattoodesigns.wordpress.com/
      The best information on old school tattoo designs
      more Best Design Schools Blogs



    Related Video with best design schools







    best design schools Video 1








    best design schools Video 2








    best design schools Video 3




    best design schools































    0 개의 댓글:

    댓글 쓰기